Private Internet Access vs PrivateVPN
When you care about privacy and need something that just works every day, two names usually come up: Private Internet Access (PIA) and PrivateVPN. PIA leans on a massive network, unlimited device support, and solid torrenting tools. PrivateVPN focuses on value, with free port forwarding and a strict no-logs stance. Your choice often hinges on network breadth, speed consistency, feature depth, and price.
In the sections below, we dig into performance, privacy, streaming, and more so you can decide which one fits your routine. Whether you plan to stream, torrent, or stay productive while traveling, this side-by-side review highlights where each service shines and where it falls short. You will also find star ratings for common use cases and suggestions if neither option feels like the right fit.
Table of Contents
Key Points
- Private Internet Access offers servers in 91 countries, including all U.S. states, plus smart DNS, dedicated IPs, split tunneling, and the MACE ad blocker.
- PrivateVPN maintains a smaller network of roughly 200 servers in 63 countries but includes port forwarding and a dedicated IP at no extra cost.
- There are other alternatives that emphasize extras like multi-hop routing or generous free tiers, which may appeal to users seeking additional privacy options.
Quick Comparison: Private Internet Access vs PrivateVPN
| Feature | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Server count & countries | Servers in 91 countries with at least one in every U.S. state | 200+ servers across 63 countries |
| Encryption & protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2/IPsec with AES-256 or ChaCha20 | WireGuard, OpenVPN, L2TP, IPsec; AES-128/256-GCM |
| Special features | Split tunneling, MACE ad blocker, RAM-based servers, streaming servers, port forwarding, SOCKS5 proxy | Port forwarding and dedicated IP included; no split tunneling |
| No-logs & audits | Strict no-logs policy and RAM-only servers | Strict no-logs policy (no independent audit) |
| P2P & streaming | P2P on all servers; dedicated streaming servers in 11 countries; smart DNS for consoles | P2P on all servers; streaming success varies by region |
At first glance, Private Internet Access brings more infrastructure and extras like split tunneling, smart DNS, and MACE. PrivateVPN is leaner, yet it includes a dedicated IP and port forwarding without extra fees. If you value unlimited devices, easy streaming, or the lowest cost, one of them will likely edge out the other. If neither meets your needs, software and hardware based options can be compelling alternatives worth exploring. Learn more on the Shellfire VPN page.
Infrastructure & Global Coverage
| Aspect | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Total servers | Thousands of servers (exact number undisclosed) in 91 countries | Just over 200 servers |
| Countries | 91 countries with full U.S. coverage | 63 countries |
| Infrastructure type | RAM-based servers with weekly resets | Standard servers |
| Specialized servers | Streaming servers in 11 countries and optional dedicated IP addresses | Dedicated IP and port forwarding included; P2P on all servers |
Private Internet Access delivers one of the most extensive networks in the industry and is the only VPN with servers in every U.S. state. It also provides paid dedicated IP options in 10 countries and uses RAM-based infrastructure for greater privacy protection. By contrast, PrivateVPN runs a much smaller fleet. While this limits your choice of locations, it can reduce server congestion and improve stability in certain regions.
For readers who want to see how PIA’s global reach compares with top competitors, take a look at the analysis of NordVPN vs Private Internet Access.
Speed & Performance
| Metric | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Download impact | Average speed drop of around 4.8% | Highly variable; some servers boost speed slightly, others slow it by up to 80% |
| Upload impact | Uploads can slow by up to 85% | Inconsistent results; some servers show major slowdowns |
| Latency | Low ping and stable speeds on streaming servers, suitable for gaming | Fluctuating latency; some servers lower ping, others increase it |
| Best protocol for speed | WireGuard, roughly 5–10% faster than OpenVPN | WireGuard (when available) |
Private Internet Access performs impressively well, with minimal impact on download speeds and reliable consistency across regions. Upload performance can dip sharply, but everyday browsing, gaming, and video streaming remain smooth. PrivateVPN, on the other hand, shows unpredictable results, some servers are fast, others noticeably slow. If stable performance is a priority, PIA’s WireGuard implementation offers one of the most balanced combinations of speed and reliability available today.
That said, heavy uploaders or competitive gamers may find both services somewhat limited. For the most stable results, exploring higher-tier options such as NordVPN or ExpressVPN can be worthwhile.
Security & Privacy
| Aspect | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | AES-256 or ChaCha20 with adjustable key length | AES-128/256-GCM |
| Protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2/IPsec | WireGuard, OpenVPN, L2TP, IPsec |
| Kill switch | Advanced kill switch that blocks traffic until the VPN connects | Kill switch failed during tests |
| No-logs policy & audits | No-logs policy with RAM-based servers | No-logs policy but no independent audit |
| Additional security | Obfuscation via Shadowsocks, MACE ad blocker, split tunneling, automation rules | Port forwarding, DNS and WebRTC leak protection |
Private Internet Access offers a robust and transparent security package. Its encryption standards are top-tier, the kill switch is dependable, and RAM-based servers ensure that user data is never written to disk. Shadowsocks helps disguise VPN traffic in restrictive environments, while MACE blocks ads and trackers effectively. PrivateVPN maintains solid encryption but its kill switch is unreliable, and the lack of third-party audits leaves some open questions about long-term trust.
Streaming Performance
| Service | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Supported platforms | Works with Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, Hulu and more when using streaming servers | Unblocks Netflix and other platforms, though results vary |
| Smart DNS | Yes, available in five countries for non-VPN devices | No |
| Streaming servers | Dedicated servers in 11 countries | No dedicated servers; trial and error required |
| Quality & stability | Consistent HD and 4K playback on optimized servers | Inconsistent performance; depends on location |
Private Internet Access stands out among 2025’s best VPNs for streaming. Its dedicated streaming servers and Smart DNS make it easy to access services like Netflix, BBC iPlayer, and Disney+ in multiple regions with smooth playback. PrivateVPN can also unblock several platforms, but since it lacks streaming-optimized servers, users often have to test multiple connections before finding one that works well.
Looking for reliable streaming access across all devices?
Our Shellfire Box is designed to provide consistent access to your favorite streaming platforms, which can be a helpful solution if you’re experiencing issues with other VPNs.
Platform Compatibility
| Platform | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Desktop OS | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS |
| Mobile OS | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| Smart TV & devices | Android TV, Fire TV, Apple TV; Smart DNS for consoles | Amazon Fire TV; manual setup for others |
| Browser extensions | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | None |
| Simultaneous connections | Unlimited | 10 devices |
Private Internet Access has one of the best compatibility profiles in the VPN space. It supports every major platform, including Linux and smart TVs, and offers convenient browser extensions. Unlimited device connections make it ideal for families or shared households. PrivateVPN covers the essentials, desktop and mobile apps plus Fire TV support, but its overall reach is narrower and limited to ten devices.
Performance in Censorship-Heavy Countries
| Country | Private Internet Access rating | PrivateVPN rating |
|---|---|---|
| China | Moderate – Shadowsocks works roughly 50% of the time | Moderate – limited obfuscation, mixed reliability |
| Iran | Poor – limited success rates | Poor – small server network |
| UAE | Moderate – results depend on server choice | Moderate – occasional success on specific servers |
| Russia | Poor – few nearby servers | Poor – minimal coverage |
Both VPNs offer some obfuscation options to bypass censorship, but neither guarantees consistent access in highly restricted regions. Private Internet Access performs slightly better in China thanks to Shadowsocks support, though even the company acknowledges that results vary. PrivateVPN includes basic obfuscation tools but its limited network makes it less reliable for users in restrictive countries.
User Experience & Apps
| Aspect | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Clean and customizable interface with automation options | Simple layout with basic and advanced modes |
| Settings granularity | Split tunneling, ping metrics, and customizable widgets | Limited options; no split tunneling |
| App stability | Stable across desktop, mobile, and TV apps | Generally stable, though kill switch can fail |
| Special features | MACE ad blocker, automation, unlimited connections | Dedicated IP, port forwarding, straightforward UI |
Private Internet Access delivers one of the smoothest user experiences available. The apps are responsive, intuitive, and packed with practical customization tools. Features like automation rules and ping metrics let you fine-tune your setup. PrivateVPN keeps things simple, which is great for beginners, but lacks advanced controls such as split tunneling. During testing, its kill switch occasionally failed, which may concern users who require constant protection.
For those who want an effortless plug-and-play option that protects every device automatically, the Shellfire Box provides network-wide encryption without the need to install VPN apps individually.
Customer Support
| Support channel | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Live chat | 24/7 live chat, sometimes unreliable | 24/7 live chat and email support |
| Email support | Yes, typically responds within 24 hours | Yes |
| Knowledge base | Extensive guides, FAQs, and troubleshooting resources | Helpful setup and troubleshooting guides |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
Both providers maintain 24/7 live chat and responsive email support. Private Internet Access offers a rich knowledge base, though some users report inconsistent chat availability. PrivateVPN delivers more reliable personal support and faster responses, but its online documentation is less comprehensive. Either way, both make it easy to get assistance when needed.
Additional Features
| Feature | Private Internet Access | PrivateVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Split tunneling | Yes, app and website level | No |
| Double VPN / multi-hop | Proxy-to-VPN multihop via Shadowsocks | No |
| Ad/tracker blocking | MACE ad blocker | No |
| Port forwarding | Yes, optional and configurable | Yes, included free |
| SOCKS5 proxy | Yes, improves torrent speeds | No |
| Other tools | Automation rules, server ping display, customizable interface | Dedicated IP and adjustable encryption levels |
Private Internet Access clearly focuses on control and versatility. Split tunneling, MACE ad blocking, Shadowsocks multihop, and customizable automation provide advanced flexibility. Port forwarding and a SOCKS5 proxy also boost torrent performance. PrivateVPN is simpler but practical, it includes free port forwarding and a dedicated IP, which many competitors charge extra for. For users who prefer a no-fuss, whole-network solution, the Shellfire Box can handle all VPN traffic at the router level with zero configuration on individual devices.
VPN Use Cases: Best Options for Streaming, Gaming, Torrenting & More
| Use case | Private Internet Access rating | PrivateVPN rating |
|---|---|---|
| Streaming | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Torrenting / P2P | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Remote work | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Budget | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Censorship-heavy countries | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Best VPN for Streaming
Private Internet Access takes the lead for streaming. With optimized servers in 11 countries and Smart DNS support, it delivers reliable access to Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, and more in high quality. PrivateVPN also unblocks major platforms, but users often need to test different servers to find a stable connection. For those who want seamless access across all devices, network-wide solutions like Shellfire VPN can be an appealing choice.
Best VPN for Torrenting / P2P
Both VPNs perform well for torrenting. PIA supports P2P on all servers and enhances speeds with port forwarding and a SOCKS5 proxy. PrivateVPN also allows torrenting everywhere and includes a dedicated IP and port forwarding for free. While both work reliably, PIA’s proxy support gives it a slight edge for faster transfers.
Best VPN for Gaming
Low latency and stability are critical for gamers. Private Internet Access excels here, with split tunneling that lets you route only your game traffic through the VPN for steady ping times. PrivateVPN offers inconsistent speeds that may cause lag spikes. For stable online gaming, PIA remains the better option overall.
Best VPN for Remote Work
Remote workers benefit from reliability and flexibility. Private Internet Access supports automation rules, unlimited device connections, and Smart DNS, perfect for laptops, VoIP phones, or streaming boxes that lack VPN apps. PrivateVPN provides a clean interface and solid protection but suffers from variable performance. If you prefer a simple, set-and-forget solution, Shellfire VPN offers fast setup and a free tier for individual users.
Best VPN for Budget-Conscious Users
Pricing is competitive for both. PIA plans start around $2 per month, including unlimited connections, MACE blocking, and split tunneling, excellent value for the features. PrivateVPN is similarly affordable and adds port forwarding and a dedicated IP for free. Your choice depends on priorities: PIA for speed and customization, PrivateVPN for simplicity and value.
Best VPN for Censorship-Heavy Countries
Bypassing censorship requires obfuscation and flexibility. PIA uses Shadowsocks, which works in about half of attempts in China and similar regions. PrivateVPN offers limited obfuscation and fewer servers, which restricts reliability. Users in restrictive areas might want to explore router-based or hardware-level options such as the Shellfire Box, which can integrate with compatible routers to provide stable encrypted access.
Conclusion
Choosing between Private Internet Access and PrivateVPN ultimately comes down to balancing performance, coverage, and ease of use. PIA stands out with its vast server network, smart DNS, streaming-optimized servers, and advanced tools like split tunneling and MACE. It’s perfect for users who value reliability, unlimited connections, and deep customization. The downside is slower upload speeds and limited success with obfuscation in restrictive regions.
PrivateVPN appeals to those who want something straightforward and affordable. It’s great for torrenting and casual streaming, but the smaller network, inconsistent speeds, and unreliable kill switch hold it back. Still, the included dedicated IP and port forwarding make it a solid budget-friendly alternative.
If neither service feels quite right, Shellfire VPN and the Shellfire Box are worth considering. They offer both software and hardware options with simple setup and strong privacy protection, letting you secure a single device or your entire home network effortlessly.
