IVPN vs Mullvad
When you look beyond the big-budget VPN brands that flood YouTube with celebrity endorsements, you’ll find a different kind of provider. IVPN and Mullvad both represent a more transparent, privacy-first philosophy: small independent teams that open-source their apps, accept anonymous payments, and invite third-party audits. After extensive real-world use, from hotel Wi-Fi to home-office setups, these services stand out for prioritizing integrity over marketing hype.
Despite sharing this privacy-centric DNA, their approaches diverge. This comparison explores how both providers perform in network reach, speed, privacy, streaming, and usability. It also highlights cases where neither service may fit perfectly and offers alternatives better suited for families or users who prioritize convenience. By the end, you’ll know whether the precision-focused IVPN or the balanced simplicity of Mullvad aligns with your needs.
Table of Contents
Key Points
- IVPN emphasizes technical security with MultiHop routing, AntiTracker, and a system-wide firewall. It uses quantum-resistant keys and supports anonymous payments but operates a smaller, self-hosted network mainly in North America and Europe, which can affect consistency in speed.
- Mullvad maintains a broader infrastructure with more than 700 servers across roughly 49 countries. It includes DNS-based ad blocking, bridge-mode MultiHop, and post-quantum tunnels, ensuring faster connections and reliability across continents.
- While many mainstream VPNs focus on streaming features or huge networks, hardware-based options can protect all your household devices without manual configuration.
Quick Comparison: IVPN vs Mullvad
| Criteria | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Price | From about US$3.89/month (Standard, 3-year plan); Pro from US$6.11/month | €5 per month flat rate |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Server network | 48 locations in 35 countries, fully self-hosted | 700+ servers in around 49 countries |
| Device limit | 2 (Standard) or 7 (Pro) | 5 |
| Supported protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 (iOS) | WireGuard, OpenVPN |
| Unique features | AntiTracker, system-wide firewall, MultiHop routing, quantum-resistant keys | Bridge-mode MultiHop, DNS-based ad blocking, post-quantum tunnels |
| Streaming support | Occasional access to Netflix US and Prime Video | Rarely unblocks major platforms |
| Best suited for | Advanced users and privacy enthusiasts | Everyday users seeking privacy with speed |
This snapshot shows the main trade-offs. IVPN is feature-rich yet limited by a smaller footprint and device cap, while Mullvad delivers broad accessibility with steady performance. Both prioritize transparency over marketing gimmicks.
For users seeking plug-and-play protection, the Shellfire Box extends VPN coverage to every device on your home network without manual setup. Meanwhile, the Shellfire VPN app provides encrypted connections on mobile in one tap, an option that balances simplicity and reliability.
Infrastructure & Global Coverage
| Metric | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Total servers/locations | 48 locations across 35 countries; fully self-hosted | 700+ servers in about 49 countries; mix of physical and RAM-only nodes |
| Americas coverage | United States, Canada, Mexico | United States, Canada, Brazil, and others |
| Europe coverage | 20+ countries | 35+ countries |
| Asia Pacific coverage | Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia | Several regions including Japan, Singapore, and Hong Kong |
| Middle East/Africa | Israel and South Africa | South Africa and limited nearby nodes |
| Server types | Fully owned physical/virtual servers | Physical and virtual (RAM-only preferred) |
| Dedicated/static IP | Not available | Not available |
IVPN keeps a smaller, tightly controlled network of self-hosted servers to ensure security and eliminate third-party interference. This approach minimizes external risk but can result in higher latency outside North America and Western Europe.
Mullvad maintains far greater geographic reach with RAM-only infrastructure to ensure that data is wiped upon reboot, offering better options for global travelers and lower average latency across continents.
For readers who prioritize global reach, our IVPN vs NordVPN comparison shows how larger networks can increase performance without compromising privacy.
Speed & Performance
| Location | IVPN (download/upload, latency) | Mullvad (download/upload, latency) |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 Mbps down / 5.7 Mbps up (~69 ms) | 189 Mbps down, low latency |
| United Kingdom | 22 Mbps down / 5.6 Mbps up (~325 ms) | 237 Mbps down with minimal delay |
| Brazil | 14 Mbps down / 4.9 Mbps up (high latency) | Typically faster than IVPN in South America |
| Asia Pacific | 24 Mbps down in Singapore (~405 ms); 21 Mbps in Sydney | About 198 Mbps down in Hong Kong with low latency |
| Average latency impact | High (~380 ms average) | Low (often under 40 ms) |
IVPN’s compact, self-hosted network inevitably affects its throughput. On nearby servers, it maintains respectable speeds, but long-distance connections suffer from latency spikes. The limited presence outside North America and Europe means users abroad may struggle to maintain stable ping times for gaming or real-time collaboration.
Mullvad, equipped with 10 Gbps ports on many nodes, consistently achieves high speeds even under load. Independent benchmarks show that it sustains near-baseline performance for browsing, file transfers, and VoIP calls. Its broader infrastructure helps reduce lag and packet loss, making it a stronger option for latency-sensitive activities.
Those prioritizing ultra-fast streaming or downloads might explore larger services optimized for performance. For reference, our Surfshark vs Mullvad comparison explores how speed-focused providers maintain efficiency while preserving solid privacy standards.
Security & Privacy
| Feature | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | AES-256-GCM and ChaCha20 | AES-256-GCM and ChaCha20 |
| Protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 (iOS) | WireGuard and OpenVPN |
| Kill switch | System-wide firewall acts as kill switch (except iOS) | Permanent kill switch across all apps |
| Split tunneling | Available on Android and iOS | Available on Linux and Android |
| Audits | Annual independent audits by Cure53 | Regular third-party audits and open-source clients |
| Logging policy | No logs; anonymous accounts; accepts cash and crypto | No logs; anonymous account numbers; accepts cash and cryptocurrency |
| Extra tools | AntiTracker, firewall, MultiHop (Pro), Obfsproxy, quantum-resistant keys | DNS-level ad blocking, Bridge mode, post-quantum tunnels |
Both VPNs prioritize privacy at their core. IVPN operates entirely self-hosted servers, uses top-tier encryption ciphers (AES-256 and ChaCha20), and supports modern protocols such as WireGuard and OpenVPN. Its annual audits confirm its no-logging policy, and its AntiTracker engine filters ads and surveillance domains by default. The system-wide firewall acts as a true network kill switch, ensuring no traffic leaks outside the tunnel.
Mullvad matches these standards while expanding transparency through open-source clients and frequent independent reviews. It implements DNS-level blocking and an optional post-quantum encryption layer that adds future-proof resilience against emerging cryptographic threats. Its anonymous account system and flat pricing structure also simplify privacy-conscious adoption without personal data exchange.
Streaming Performance
| Platform | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Netflix US | Works on selected servers | Rarely works |
| Other Netflix regions | Inconsistent results | No access |
| Amazon Prime Video | Occasionally works | No access |
| Disney+ | No access | No access |
| Hulu / BBC iPlayer | Accessible on some servers | No access |
| Smart DNS or media streamer | Not offered | Not offered |
Neither IVPN nor Mullvad is designed with streaming as a priority. In testing, IVPN occasionally unlocks Netflix US, Hulu, and BBC iPlayer, though success can vary daily as platforms update their blocklists. Streaming reliability depends on manual server selection and persistence when facing geo-errors.
Mullvad rarely bypasses regional restrictions and lacks Smart DNS support, which means setup on smart TVs or streaming devices requires router-level configuration. For casual viewers seeking a simple solution, hardware like the Shellfire Box can extend VPN coverage to entire home networks and enable access to various platforms without complex setup.
Looking for consistent streaming on every device?
The Shellfire Box offers network-wide protection and uninterrupted access to your favorite platforms without manual VPN setup on each device.
Platform Compatibility
| Platform / Device | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Windows & macOS | Yes, open-source clients with built-in AntiTracker and firewall | Yes, open-source apps with intuitive UI |
| Linux | Full support (GUI and CLI) | Full support (GUI and CLI) |
| iOS & Android | Yes, includes split tunnelling and tracker blocking | Yes, includes split tunnelling and custom DNS |
| Browser extensions | No extensions | Available with proxy and WebRTC-blocker |
| Streaming devices | Manual setup via router | Manual setup via router |
| Game consoles | Router configuration required | Router configuration required |
| Router support | OpenVPN and WireGuard profiles available | OpenVPN and WireGuard profiles available |
| Simultaneous connections | 2 (Standard) or 7 (Pro) | 5 |
Both providers offer cross-platform apps that are easy to install and open source for transparency. IVPN’s software focuses on security customization, giving you quick access to AntiTracker controls, MultiHop routing, and protocol selection. Its only drawback is the restrictive device limit, which may not suit larger households.
Mullvad delivers similar versatility with simpler menus, supporting Linux split tunnelling and custom DNS entries. It even adds browser extensions for blocking WebRTC leaks and managing proxy routes. Neither VPN provides Smart DNS or automatic configuration for streaming boxes, but both can be manually configured on routers for full-home protection.
Performance in Censorship-Heavy Countries
| Country | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| China | Occasional success using Obfsproxy and MultiHop | Works more reliably via Bridge mode and Shadowsocks |
| Iran | Mixed results with Obfsproxy | Moderate success using Bridge mode |
| United Arab Emirates | Unreliable | Limited success |
| Russia | Variable; some servers work with obfuscation | Variable |
| Turkey | Functional with MultiHop or Obfsproxy | Stable with Bridge mode |
IVPN supports Obfsproxy and MultiHop to disguise VPN traffic, helping it bypass moderate blocks in restrictive regions. However, the limited number of available obfuscated servers makes it inconsistent under heavy censorship. In countries where deep packet inspection is common, success may fluctuate depending on the server load and time of day.
Mullvad employs Bridge mode, which pairs a Shadowsocks proxy with a VPN tunnel to evade filters more effectively. It tends to outperform IVPN in places like China and Turkey. Still, neither service guarantees access in regions with aggressive network controls, so users planning international travel should download configuration files beforehand and test connectivity in advance.
User Experience & Apps
| Aspect | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Interface design | Minimalist and technical | Minimalist and clean |
| Ease of use | Moderate; packed with advanced controls | Very easy; intuitive layout |
| Server selection | List view with latency indicators | Map and list with load metrics and favourites |
| Settings & customisation | AntiTracker, firewall, ports, MultiHop (Pro) | Bridge mode, split tunnelling, DNS configuration |
| Stability | Stable, though dense UI | Highly stable, smooth UX |
| Language support | Limited | Multi-language interface |
Both VPNs prioritise functionality over visual flair. IVPN offers technical transparency by displaying live latency, server load, and granular settings, but it can appear complex to casual users. Its layout suits professionals who want fine control over connection parameters and security layers.
Mullvad takes the opposite route with simplicity. Its map-based interface lets users connect with one click, while key features such as Bridge mode or DNS blocking are just a toggle away. It’s fast, polished, and lightweight, making it ideal for users who want powerful privacy tools without micromanaging configurations.
Those who prefer effortless protection across all devices might appreciate the Shellfire Box, which routes every connected gadget through an encrypted tunnel automatically. For on-the-go security, the Shellfire VPN app delivers one-tap privacy without setup complexity.
Customer Support
| Support channel | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Live chat | Yes, via website | No |
| Email support | Replies within 24 hours | Replies typically within a day |
| Knowledge base | Comprehensive but less organised | Detailed guides and FAQs |
| Community forum | No dedicated forum | Active forum and GitHub issue tracker |
| Tutorial videos | Few third-party resources | Limited but clear tutorials |
IVPN provides direct communication through live chat and email tickets, ensuring quick responses to technical queries. Its help section includes many topics but can be tricky to navigate. Support feels efficient yet minimalistic, reflecting its small-team operation.
Mullvad relies on written documentation and an engaged community forum rather than live agents. Users can troubleshoot via GitHub or detailed setup guides that cover every platform. While it lacks instant chat, the self-help ecosystem is extensive and frequently updated, giving experienced users plenty of control over problem-solving.
Additional Features
| Feature | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| MultiHop / Multi-server routing | Available on Pro plan; customizable routes | Available via Bridge mode |
| Ad & tracker blocking | AntiTracker with Hardcore mode to block surveillance companies | DNS-based ad and tracker blocking |
| Port forwarding | Removed to improve security | Removed to prevent abuse |
| Quantum-resistant encryption | Pre-shared keys add post-quantum protection | Optional post-quantum tunnels available |
| Obfuscation / Stealth tools | Obfsproxy disguises VPN traffic | Shadowsocks-based Bridge mode |
| Split tunnelling | Mobile apps only | Linux and Android |
| Open-source apps | Yes | Yes |
While both VPNs focus on transparency and security, their philosophies differ slightly. IVPN emphasises fine control, its MultiHop routing lets users create custom chains across countries, while AntiTracker and Hardcore mode provide granular control over ad and telemetry blocking. Its firewall-based kill switch and quantum-resistant WireGuard connections enhance long-term privacy resilience.
Mullvad prefers elegant simplicity. Its integrated Bridge mode automatically enables multi-hop routing through Shadowsocks, while DNS-level blocking filters unwanted traffic at the network layer. Post-quantum tunnels are optional for advanced users seeking forward security. Both providers removed port forwarding to reduce exposure to abuse, trading flexibility for safety.
For users who prefer automated, hardware-based protection, the Shellfire Box offers always-on encryption for every device connected to your router. Combined with the Shellfire VPN app for mobile, it provides a simple, effective alternative to manual setup.
VPN Use Cases: Best Options for Streaming, Gaming, Torrenting & More
| Use case | IVPN | Mullvad |
|---|---|---|
| Streaming | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Torrenting / P2P | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Gaming | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Remote work | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Budget-conscious users | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Censorship bypass | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Best VPN for Streaming
IVPN can occasionally access Netflix US, Hulu, and BBC iPlayer, though success depends on the server and time of day. It lacks Smart DNS but provides enough flexibility for occasional streaming if you’re patient with testing. Mullvad focuses strictly on privacy, so streaming platforms usually remain blocked.
Those who value simplicity over constant configuration can use the Shellfire Box to protect streaming devices automatically, ensuring private access without repeated VPN installations or DNS tweaks.
Best VPN for Torrenting / P2P
Both VPNs support peer-to-peer traffic across all servers and enforce no-logs policies. Mullvad stands out thanks to consistently higher speeds, system-wide ad blocking, and a more extensive network that prevents congestion. IVPN performs reliably on nearby nodes but may slow under heavy load due to fewer locations. Neither offers port forwarding anymore, a trade-off for improved network safety.
Best VPN for Gaming
Low ping and stable routes are essential for online play. Mullvad maintains a clear edge with its larger server network and high-speed infrastructure, keeping latency under 40 ms in many regions. IVPN, with fewer nodes, can struggle to maintain fast response times across continents but still provides solid encryption and stability for nearby servers.
For console gamers or families, a router-based device like the Shellfire Box offers effortless whole-network protection, encrypting game traffic without individual app configuration.
Best VPN for Remote Work
Mullvad is the stronger choice for professionals working remotely, offering smooth video calls and file transfers through split tunnelling and fast, stable nodes. IVPN delivers robust protection with its firewall and MultiHop, though performance may vary based on server proximity. Both services support secure connections for sensitive business communications.
Best VPN for Budget-Conscious Users
IVPN offers a cost-effective Standard plan starting around US$3.89 per month when paid long-term, including essential privacy tools for two devices. Mullvad charges a flat €5 with all features unlocked, providing predictable pricing and fair value. Users focused on savings may lean toward IVPN, while those seeking simplicity and speed might find Mullvad’s rate worth the small premium.
Best VPN for Censorship-Heavy Countries
IVPN offers obfuscation through Obfsproxy and MultiHop to disguise VPN traffic, but reliability under strong censorship can fluctuate. Mullvad’s Shadowsocks-powered Bridge mode performs slightly better under restrictive conditions, though neither service can guarantee access in highly filtered environments. Travellers should prepare configurations in advance.
Can I use IVPN or Mullvad on multiple devices at the same time?
Yes. Both VPNs allow simultaneous connections across several devices. IVPN supports two devices on its Standard plan and seven on Pro, while Mullvad allows five connections by default. If you need protection for more gadgets, such as smart TVs, laptops, and smartphones, installing either service on your router or using the Shellfire Box ensures your entire network is covered through one connection.
Do IVPN and Mullvad work well for online anonymity?
Absolutely. Both are among the few VPNs that remain committed to genuine anonymity. They collect no identifiable data, use open-source apps, and allow anonymous payment methods such as cash or cryptocurrency. Their transparent audit records confirm the absence of logs and backdoors. For users who want to stay private while browsing, torrenting, or communicating securely, both IVPN and Mullvad are excellent long-term options.
Conclusion
Choosing between IVPN and Mullvad depends on whether you prefer granular control or streamlined performance. IVPN appeals to advanced users who value precision: its firewall-based kill switch, tracker blocking, and customizable MultiHop routes provide exceptional control over network behavior. However, its small network and limited device allowance may frustrate larger households.
Mullvad offers a smoother experience, combining speed, open-source transparency, and simplicity under a flat-rate plan. With faster connections, DNS blocking, and post-quantum tunnels, it strikes the ideal balance for most privacy-conscious users. Both outperform many mainstream competitors in integrity and data protection, proving that independent VPNs can compete with corporate giants on quality and ethics.
For users who prefer plug-and-play protection, the Shellfire Box and Shellfire VPN app extend privacy to every connected device without advanced setup. While they may lack multi-hop customization, they offer reliable, simple security for the entire home network.
